You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content— here. News this year has fractured communities, and caused confusion and panic for many of us.
No one can control what will happen next. But you can support a debate based on fair, accurate and transparent information. As independent, impartial fact checkers, we rely on individuals like you to ensure the most dangerously false inaccuracies can be called out and challenged. First, the building is not solid; it is 95 percent air and, hence, can implode onto itself.
Second, there is no lateral load, even the impact of a speeding aircraft, which is sufficient to move the center of gravity one hundred feet to the side such that it is not within the base footprint of the structure. Third, given the near free-fall collapse, there was insufficient time for portions to attain significant lateral velocity.
To summarize all of these points, a , t structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down. The World Trade Center was not defectively designed. No designer of the WTC anticipated, nor should have anticipated, a 90, L Molotov cocktail on one of the building floors.
Skyscrapers are designed to support themselves for three hours in a fire even if the sprinkler system fails to operate. This time should be long enough to evacuate the occupants. No normal office fires would fill 4, square meters of floor space in the seconds in which the WTC fire developed. Usually, the fire would take up to an hour to spread so uniformly across the width and breadth of the building. This was a very large and rapidly progressing fire very high heat but not unusually high temperature.
After all, 1,, t of rubble will require 20, to 30, truckloads to haul away the material. The asbestos fire insulation makes the task hazardous for those working nearby. Separation of the stone and concrete is a common matter for modern steel shredders. The land-filling of , t of concrete and stone rubble is more problematic. There will undoubtedly be a number of changes in the building codes as a result of the WTC catastrophe.
For example, emergency communication systems need to be upgraded to speed up the notice for evacuation and the safest paths of egress. Emergency illumination systems, separate from the normal building lighting, are already on the drawing boards as a result of lessons learned from the WTC bombing in There will certainly be better fire protection of structural members. Protection from smoke inhalation, energy-absorbing materials, and redundant means of egress will all be considered.
A basic engineering assessment of the design of the World Trade Center dispels many of the myths about its collapse. First, the perimeter tube design of the towers protected them from failing upon impact. The outer columns were engineered to stiffen the towers in heavy wind, and they protected the inner core, which held the gravity load.
Removal of some of the outer columns alone could not bring the building down. Furthermore, because of the stiffness of the perimeter design, it was impossible for the aircraft impact to topple the building. However, the building was not able to withstand the intense heat of the jet fuel fire. While it was impossible for the fuel-rich, diffuse-flame fire to burn at a temperature high enough to melt the steel, its quick ignition and intense heat caused the steel to lose at least half its strength and to deform, causing buckling or crippling.
This weakening and deformation caused a few floors to fall, while the weight of the stories above them crushed the floors below, initiating a domino collapse. It would be impractical to design buildings to withstand the fuel load induced by a burning commercial airliner.
Instead of saving the building, engineers and officials should focus on saving the lives of those inside by designing better safety and evacuation systems.
As scientists and engineers, we must not succumb to speculative thinking when a tragedy such as this occurs. The door is wide open for NIST to make the corrections. It showed that it was impossible. But the truth of the free-fall collapse is very simple.
Just looking at the video clips of the story building dropping symmetrically, with little deformation reveals to most open-people that it was a controlled demolition.
Just watch it, and judge for yourself. In this vein, I would like to point to a very important expert interview that is incredibly damning of the official story. The interview was conducted by Dutch television reporters, who asked Danny Jowenko, a leading building demolition expert in Europe, what he saw when they showed him a clip of WTC 7 falling.
They did not tell him what building it was beforehand, nor did he appear to recognize it. His immediate and unequivocal reaction was that it was a controlled demolition.
The interview is in three parts on YouTube, in Dutch with English subtitles. Here is a link to the first part:. Excellent article, thank you. And well done to all the architects and engineers who tirelessly helped realise this important scientific body of work. The findings from UAF are unimpeachable.
A full copy of the report is available for free at the University website, where all professionals should see for themselves. Hulsey et al, and all those at AE truth, are to be commended for their perseverance and bravery. WTC 7 was clearly visible behind her in the background. This has now been confirmed by University of Alaska Fairbanks.
My compliments for this honest and factual reporting. Thank you. Please stand up to the upcoming requests to censor yourself speaking about reality in stead of some narrative pushed by those Powers that Should Not Be. Have a nice day. The collapse was only a controlled demolition.
No one under the logical science could believe the NIST theory. Surprise surprise….. Wouldnt be surprised if the WH tries to stop all that.
All those people who lost their lives and some families are still in trauma, deserve to know how American Govt murdered its own people in cold blood. Be still, my heart! It is encouraging that a large newspaper has covered this story as it certainly lacks coverage practically every where else.
Clearly they know this is not true. I have followed AETruth. I feel they are on the correct track. Personally, I think it is important that we keep this a scientific discussion rather than get distracted on who, why and for what. NIST needs to be able to prove that the UAF study which is publicly available is not accurate or at least be able to make their modelling information public so that others can scrutinize their findings.
The evidence is clear and now we must get out the crayons and show the fact that you have exposed The real criminals. Time now for justice before they all die of old age. Thank you for this long overdue story it demonstrates a truly honest approach to this remarkable coverup of facts by NIST. Well done. Steel framed buildings cannot collapse in free fall unless the strength has been completely removed below the falling section.
Even Shyam Sunder lead investigator for NIST explained why that is impossible from fire in a press conference in August to launch the draft edition of their report into the collapse. Looks like a demolition to me! This report just confirms what my eyes were telling me when the buildings came down. It was a controlled demolition and a false flag operation so the administration could pass the patriot act without any pushback from anyone and it worked perfectly.
Even Senator Bob Graham of Florida has many questions concerning this physical impossibility but he has ben kept from stating his knowledge due to the possibility of prosecution. I also wanted to add that in this world the physics would make this kind of free fall collapse impossible. In this day and age — during the information revolution — we should not have to wait twenty years for there to be mainstream discussion of the event from a scientific perspective. NIST, by abandoning science, has done the world a terrible disservice.
Those responsible deserve to be held in opprobrium. John Hort is on target. Neo-Cons Zakheim, Wolfowitz, et al participated in the study. Zakheim was Comptroller of the Pentagon budget. A missile hit the Pentagon destroying the section where the ONI was investigating the fraud.
Owner Silverstein wanted to redevelop the WTC but faced billion dollar bills for asbestos fire-proofing removal. But the failure visibly began in the centre. Each fraud was covered up by another. A few thousand spectators, some may have videotaped it, a nice reward may tease out a few of these so we can compare the tapes. Delivered coffee to Windows on the World restaurant , the elevator banks were two and three feet deep steel reenforced concrete , they would have been standing if a fire took down the buildings.
The cleaning crews and bomb sniffing dogs were removed in the Summer of Too many unanswered questions , this was the Millitary Industrial Complex and the Corporate Masters of the Universe looking out for their interests.
Journalists are in the same situation. If you value your job, you better go along with what the government says. Thank you AET for being a voice of reason. Here is an explanation of their importance. They were in Afghanistan the month after. Please research what we are saying. God Bless. WTC 7. The collapse of this building, when viewed from most angles, does appear to resemble a demolition.
Of particular concern is this building was not a towering inferno by any stretch of the imagination. The UAF report raises some very important questions which must be answered thoroughly and precisely. There is much at stake here for two reasons. No individual or agency has ever been able to demonstrate the motions observed for both Building 7 and the twin towers, using a real world experiment. The NIST analysis and progressive collapse theory disagrees with experiment.
Rather it was brought down in a classic controlled demolition manner. And thanks very much to daily commercial news for printing this, very happy to see this. Their authority and expertise was considered to be the industry standard for all things quality. How disappointing that now they are just another compromised organization whose credibility is long gone.
Judging by practically every comment here there are a lot of people due to be disappointed if they think anything should result from this, since the collapse of WTC7 was not a controlled demolition, but a structural collapse.
Hulsey, Gage, Walter, Korol, etc. That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed. The building was utterly important due to the presence of the Secret Service, the CIA, the Department of Defense and the Office of Emergency Management, which was supposed to coordinate any response to terrorist attacks.
Even after 20 years since the deadly attacks, some conspiracies continue to contest the government claims but so far, no concrete evidence has been provided to support them and theories remain View in App. Follow Us. Story highlights The report found that fires that followed the impact of debris from the fall of the North Tower caused the collapse of WTC 7, however, delayed and insignificant information led to several mysteries and conspiracy theories.
0コメント